Pathogenic, Total Loss-of-Function DYRK1B Variants Cause Monogenic Obesity Associated With Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Rare variants in DYRK1B have been described in some patients with central obesity, type 2 diabetes, and early-onset coronary disease. Owing to the limited number of conducted studies, the broader impact of DYRK1B variants on a larger scale has yet to be investigated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: DYRK1B was sequenced in 9,353 participants from a case-control study for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Each DYRK1B variant was functionally assessed in vitro. Variant pathogenicity was determined using criteria from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). The effect of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants on metabolic traits was assessed using adjusted mixed-effects score tests. RESULTS: Sixty-five rare, heterozygous DYRK1B variants were identified and were not associated with obesity or type 2 diabetes. Following functional analyses, 20 P/LP variants were pinpointed, including 6 variants that exhibited a fully inhibitory effect (P/LP-null) on DYRK1B activity. P/LP and P/LP-null DYRK1B variants were associated with increased BMI and obesity risk; however, the impact was notably more pronounced for the P/LP-null variants (effect of 8.0 ± 3.2 and odds ratio of 7.9 [95% CI 1.2-155]). Furthermore, P/LP-null variants were associated with higher fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes risk (effect of 2.9 ± 1.0 and odds ratio of 4.8 [95% CI 0.85-37]), while P/LP variants had no effect on glucose homeostasis. CONCLUSIONS: P/LP, total loss-of-function DYRK1B variants cause monogenic obesity associated with type 2 diabetes. This study underscores the significance of conducting functional assessments in order to accurately ascertain the tangible effects of P/LP DYRK1B variants.

Pathogenic monoallelic variants in GLIS3 increase type 2 diabetes risk and identify a subgroup of patients sensitive to sulfonylureas.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: GLIS3 encodes a transcription factor involved in pancreatic beta cell development and function. Rare pathogenic, bi-allelic mutations in GLIS3 cause syndromic neonatal diabetes whereas frequent SNPs at this locus associate with common type 2 diabetes risk. Because rare, functional variants located in other susceptibility genes for type 2 diabetes have already been shown to strongly increase individual risk for common type 2 diabetes, we aimed to investigate the contribution of rare pathogenic GLIS3 variants to type 2 diabetes. METHODS: GLIS3 was sequenced in 5471 individuals from the Rare Variants Involved in Diabetes and Obesity (RaDiO) study. Variant pathogenicity was assessed following the criteria established by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). To address the pathogenic strong criterion number 3 (PS3), we conducted functional investigations of these variants using luciferase assays, focusing on capacity of GLIS family zinc finger 3 (GLIS3) to bind to and activate the INS promoter. The association between rare pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and type 2 diabetes risk (and other metabolic traits) was then evaluated. A meta-analysis combining association results from RaDiO, the 52K study (43,125 individuals) and the TOPMed study (44,083 individuals) was finally performed. RESULTS: Through targeted resequencing of GLIS3, we identified 105 rare variants that were carried by 395 participants from RaDiO. Among them, 49 variants decreased the activation of the INS promoter. Following ACMG criteria, 18 rare variants were classified as P/LP, showing an enrichment in the last two exons compared with the remaining exons (p<5×10-6; OR>3.5). The burden of these P/LP variants was strongly higher in individuals with type 2 diabetes (p=3.0×10-3; OR 3.9 [95% CI 1.4, 12]), whereas adiposity, age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis and cholesterol levels were similar between variant carriers and non-carriers with type 2 diabetes. Interestingly, all carriers with type 2 diabetes were sensitive to oral sulfonylureas. A total of 7 P/LP variants were identified in both 52K and TOPMed studies. The meta-analysis of association studies obtained from RaDiO, 52K and TOPMed showed an enrichment of P/LP GLIS3 variants in individuals with type 2 diabetes (p=5.6×10-5; OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.4, 2.9]). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Rare P/LP GLIS3 variants do contribute to type 2 diabetes risk. The variants located in the distal part of the protein could have a direct effect on its functional activity by impacting its transactivation domain, by homology with the mouse GLIS3 protein. Furthermore, rare P/LP GLIS3 variants seem to have a direct clinical effect on beta cell function, which could be improved by increasing insulin secretion via the use of sulfonylureas.

Exploring the role of purinergic receptor P2RY1 in type 2 diabetes risk and pathophysiology: Insights from human functional genomics.

OBJECTIVE: Human functional genomics has proven powerful in discovering drug targets for common metabolic disorders. Through this approach, we investigated the involvement of the purinergic receptor P2RY1 in type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: P2RY1 was sequenced in 9,266 participants including 4,177 patients with T2D. In vitro analyses were then performed to assess the functional effect of each variant. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis was performed in pancreatic islets from 103 pancreatectomized individuals. The effect of P2RY1 on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was finally assessed in human pancreatic beta cells (EndoCßH5), and RNA sequencing was performed on these cells. RESULTS: Sequencing P2YR1 in 9,266 participants revealed 22 rare variants, seven of which were loss-of-function according to our in vitro analyses. Carriers, except one, exhibited impaired glucose control. Our eQTL analysis of human islets identified P2RY1 variants, in a beta-cell enhancer, linked to increased P2RY1 expression and reduced T2D risk, contrasting with variants located in a silent region associated with decreased P2RY1 expression and increased T2D risk. Additionally, a P2RY1-specific agonist increased insulin secretion upon glucose stimulation, while the antagonist led to decreased insulin secretion. RNA-seq highlighted TXNIP as one of the main transcriptomic markers of insulin secretion triggered by P2RY1 agonist. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that P2RY1 inherited or acquired dysfunction increases T2D risk and that P2RY1 activation stimulates insulin secretion. Selective P2RY1 agonists, impermeable to the blood-brain barrier, could serve as potential insulin secretagogues.

Impact of chronic emotions and psychosocial stress on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Heterogeneity of glycemic responses, biological mechanisms, and personalized medical treatment.

Many studies have clearly established that chronic psychosocial stress may sustainably worsen glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DMM), thus promoting diabetes complications. Chronic psychosocial stress may be due to: i) the long-term accumulation of stressful life events that require readjustment on the part of the individual (loosing friends, changing schools), and/or ii) exposure to severe chronic stressors (persistent difficulties and adversities of life). Whatever the reason, many studies have clearly established a positive correlation between chronic psychosocial stress and HbA1c levels. However, a small fraction of patients is minimally affected or not affected at all by chronic psychosocial stress. Conversely, positive life events can substantially improve glycemic control. Recent evidence suggests the existence of subpopulations that differ in personality traits, neurohormonal regulatory responses, and food intake behavior (increased or decreased). Better characterization of the clinical and neurohormonal differences between these subpopulations may help develop personalized treatment strategies in the future. In the near future, psychotherapeutic support and automated insulin delivery (AID) could alleviate chronic stress, prevent worsening glycemic control, and ease the burden of diabetes.

First Generation of a Modular Interoperable Closed-Loop System for Automated Insulin Delivery in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Lessons From Trials and Real-Life Data.

BACKGROUND: DBLG1 (Diabeloop Generation 1) stands as one of the five commercially available closed-loop solution worldwide for patients with type 1 diabetes as of 2023. Our aim was to provide an overview of all data obtained with this system regarding outcomes and populations, with an emphasis on interoperability. METHODS: This report includes all available sources of data (three randomized control trials and five surveys on real-life data). Collection ran from March 3, 2017 to April 30, 2022. RESULTS: We gathered data from 6859 adult patients treated with closed-loop from three to 12 months. Overall, all sources of data showed that time in range (TIR) 70 to 180 mg/dL, starting from 47.4% to 56.6%, improved from 12.2 to 17.3 percentage points. Time in hypoglycemia was reduced by 48% in average (range: 26%-70%) and reached a level of 1.3% in the largest and most recent cohort. In patients with excessive time in hypoglycemia at baseline (≥5%), closed-loop allowed a reduction in time below range (TBR) by 59%. The comparison of days with declared physical activity versus days without physical activity did not show differences in TBR. The improvement in TIR observed with three different pump systems (Vicentra Kaleido, n = 117; Sooil Dana-I, n = 84; and Roche Insight, n = 6684) ranged from 15.4 to 17.3 percentage points. DISCUSSION: These data obtained in different European countries were consistent throughout all reports, showing that this closed-loop system is efficient (high improvement in TIR), safe (remarkably low level of TBR), and interoperable (three pump settings so far).

Hospital stays and costs of telemedical monitoring versus standard follow-up for diabetic foot ulcer: an open-label randomised controlled study.

Background: Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have previously shown that telemedical monitoring of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) reduces the number of visits to the outpatient clinic, without losing treatment efficacy or increasing costs. Here we present the results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial designed to investigate whether telemonitoring, provided by an expert nurse (with extensive experience in DFU and trained in remote monitoring), reduces the hospital stay and the associated costs for a patient with DFU (TELEPIED trial). Methods: Eligible patients (n = 180) were randomly allocated to: (i) a control group, in which they received standard care, and (ii) an intervention group, in which they received asynchronous telemedicine follow-up by the expert nurse. The primary outcome was the cumulative hospital days over 12 months. The main secondary outcomes were (i) direct healthcare costs (estimated in a collective perspective), (ii) wound healing and (iii) amputation rates. ITT (intention-to-treat) population was analysed. Findings: In the ITT population, cumulative hospital days were significantly higher in the control group (13.4 days [95% CI 9.0-17.8]) than in the intervention group (7.1 days [2.8-11.5]) (p = 0.0458, ANCOVA model). Cumulative direct costs over 12 months were 7185 € (95% CI 5144-9226) in the control group and 3471 € (95% CI 1430-5512) in the intervention group (p = 0.0120). The percentage of wounds healed and amputation rate were not significantly different between groups. Similar results were found with the PP population. Interpretation: The implementation of a telemedical intervention with an expert nurse could lead to a length of hospitalization and direct costs that were two times lower compared to conventional follow-up. This lower medical and economic burden was obtained without losing effectiveness on the rate of healing, nor increasing the amputation rate. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings. Funding: This study was designed, funded and conducted by CERITD (Study and Research Centre for Intensification of Diabetes Treatment, Evry, France), Genopole GIP, 20 rue Henri Desbruères, 91030 EVRY Cedex and Laboratoires URGO, 15 Avenue d'Iéna, 75116 Paris Cedex, France. The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsor. The corresponding author (DD) certify that authors were not precluded from accessing data in the study, and they accept responsibility to submit for publication.

One-year real-world performance of the DBLG1 closed-loop system: Data from 3706 adult users with type 1 diabetes in Germany.

AIM: The Diabeloop Generation 1 (DBLG1) system is an interoperable hybrid closed-loop solution that was commercialized in Germany in March 2021. We report the longitudinal glycaemic outcomes among the first 3706 users in a real-world setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective data collection of all consenting adult patients with type 1 diabetes who were equipped in Germany with the DBLG1 system before 30 April 2022, and with a minimum 14 days of closed-loop usage. RESULTS: In total, 3706 users (41% women, age 45.1 ± 14.5 years) met the inclusion criteria, reaching a mean follow-up of 131.0 ± 85.1 days, an overall 485 600 days of continuous glucose monitoring data, and a median time spent in closed-loop of 95.0% (IQR 89.1-97.4). The median percentage time in range (70-180 mg/dl) was 72.1% (IQR 65.0-78.9); the time below 70 mg/dl was 0.9% (0.5-1.7), the time below 54 mg/dl was 0.1% (0.1-0.3), and the median Glucose Management Index was 7.0% (6.8-7.3). Exploratory analysis of a subset of 2460 patients in whom baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was available [7.4% (IQR 6.9-8.0)] showed that the achieved mean time in range was influenced by baseline HbA1c, ranging from 65.8 ± 9.9% (A1c ≥8.5%) to 81.3 ± 6.8% (A1c <6.5%). CONCLUSION: This large real-world analysis confirms the relevance of the DBLG1 automated insulin delivery solution for the achievement of standards of care in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

Contribution of heterozygous PCSK1 variants to obesity and implications for precision medicine: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Rare biallelic pathogenic mutations in PCSK1 (encoding proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 [PC1/3]) cause early-onset obesity associated with various endocrinopathies. Setmelanotide has been approved for carriers of these biallelic mutations in the past 3 years. We aimed to perform a large-scale functional genomic study focusing on rare heterozygous variants of PCSK1 to decipher their putative impact on obesity risk. METHODS: This case-control study included all participants with overweight and obesity (ie, cases) or healthy weight (ie, controls) from the RaDiO study of three community-based and one hospital-based cohort in France recruited between Jan 1, 1995, and Dec 31, 2000. In adults older than 18 years, healthy weight was defined as BMI of less than 25·0 kg/m2, overweight as 25·0-29·9 kg/m2, and obesity as 30·0 kg/m2 or higher. Participants with type 2 diabetes had fasting glucose of 7·0 mmol/L or higher or used treatment for hyperglycaemia (or both) and were negative for islet or insulin autoantibodies. Functional assessment of rare missense variants of PCSK1 was performed. Pathogenicity clusters of variants were determined with machine learning. The effect of each cluster of PCSK1 variants on obesity was assessed using the adjusted mixed-effects score test. FINDINGS: All 13 coding exons of PCSK1 were sequenced in 9320 participants (including 7260 adults and 2060 children and adolescents) recruited from the RaDiO study. We detected 65 rare heterozygous PCSK1 variants, including four null variants and 61 missense variants that were analysed in vitro and clustered into five groups (A-E), according to enzymatic activity. Compared with the wild-type, 15 missense variants led to complete PC1/3 loss of function (group A; reference) and rare exome variant ensemble learner (REVEL) led to 15 (25%) false positives and four (7%) false negatives. Carrying complete loss-of-function or null PCSK1 variants was significantly associated with obesity (six [86%] of seven carriers vs 1518 [35%] of 4395 non-carriers; OR 9·3 [95% CI 1·5-177·4]; p=0·014) and higher BMI (32·0 kg/m2 [SD 9·3] in carriers vs 27·3 kg/m2 [6·5] in non-carriers; mean effect π 6·94 [SE 1·95]; p=0·00029). Clusters of PCSK1 variants with partial or neutral effect on PC1/3 activity did not have an effect on obesity or overweight and on BMI. INTERPRETATION: Only carriers of heterozygous, null, or complete loss-of-function PCSK1 variants cause monogenic obesity and, therefore, might be eligible for setmelanotide. In silico tests were unable to accurately detect these variants, which suggests that in vitro assays are necessary to determine the variant pathogenicity for genetic diagnosis and precision medicine purposes. FUNDING: Agence Nationale de la Recherche, European Research Council, National Center for Precision Diabetic Medicine, European Regional Development Fund, Hauts-de-France Regional Council, and the European Metropolis of Lille.

Hybrid Closed-Loop Control with Ultrarapid Lispro Compared with Standard Insulin Aspart and Faster Insulin Aspart: An In Silico Study.

OBJECTIVE: There is room for improvement in the performance of closed-loop regulation algorithms during the prandial period. This in silico study evaluated the efficiency and safety of ultrarapid lispro insulin using the Diabeloop DBLG1® algorithm. METHODS: We modeled the insulin profile of URLi according to literature data and integrated it to the model used within a simulation platform built from a 60 patients' virtual cohort. We then ran the DBLG1® algorithm in silico with various meal intakes using modeled URLi, Aspart and Faster Aspart. The primary endpoints were glucose metrics (time in 70-180 mg/dL range and time below range). RESULTS: When insulin time constant values were tuned, time in 70-180 mg/dL range was 69.4 [61.1-75.6] (Aspart) vs 74.7 [65.5-81.5] (URLi). Glucose coefficient of variation was reduced from 34.1 [29.7-37.8] to 28.4 [25.7-34.6]. Time below 70 mg/dL and 54 mg/dL were significantly reduced with URLi, whether or not DBLG1 was specifically tuned to this insulin. Metrics with Faster Aspart were intermediate and did not significantly differ from URLi. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation study performed on a virtual T1D population suggests that the use of URLi within an unmodified closed-loop DBLG1 regulation algorithm is safe and, with DBLG1 being tuned to this specific insulin type, improved the regulation performances as compared with Aspart. This fact supports the use of such an insulin in clinical investigations.

Efficacy of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Solution in Patients With Excessive Time in Hypoglycaemia: A Post Hoc Analysis of Trials With DBLG1 System.

BACKGROUND: Automated insulin delivery is an efficient treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes. Little is known on its impact on patients with excessive time in hypoglycaemia. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of three randomized control trials that used the DBLG1 (Diabeloop Generation 1) hybrid closed-loop solution. Patients whose time below 70 mg/dL during baseline, open-loop phase exceeded 5% were selected. The outcomes were the differences between the closed-loop and the open-loop phases in time in various ranges and Glycemia Risk Index (GRI). RESULTS: We identified 45 patients exhibiting ≥5% of time below 70 mg/dL during the open-loop phase. Under closed-loop, the time in hypoglycaemia (54 to <70 mg/dL) dropped from 7.9% (SD 2.4) to 3.2% (SD 1.6) (difference -4.7% [-5.3; -4.1], P < 10-4). The time below 54 mg/dL decreased from 1.9% (SD 1.3) to 0.8% (SD 0.7) (difference -0.9% [-1.4; -0.8], P < 10-4). The time in range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL) improved from 63.3 (SD 9.5) to 68.2% (SD 8.2) (difference 5.1% [2.9; 7.0], P < 10-4). The GRI improved from 51.2 (SD 12.4) to 38.0 (SD 10.9) (difference 13.2 [10.4; 16.0], P < 10-4). CONCLUSION: DBLG1 decreased time in hypoglycaemia by more than 50% even in patients with excessive time in hypoglycaemia at baseline, while also improving both TIR and GRI, under real-life conditions. The improvement in GRI (13.2%) exceeded that of the improvement in TIR (5.1%) indicating that in this data set, GRI was more sensitive than TIR to the improvement in glycaemia achieved with closed-loop. These results support the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery versus sensor-augmented pump therapy in children aged 6-12 years: a randomised, controlled, cross-over, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Time in range (TIR) goals are rarely met in children with type 1 diabetes, except at the cost of increased hypoglycaemia episodes. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of the Diabeloop DBL4K (Diabeloop, Grenoble, France) hybrid closed-loop system in prepubescent children. METHODS: We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, two-session crossover study in the paediatric endocrinology departments of three university hospitals in France and Belgium. Eligible participants were aged 6-12 years with type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year, glycated haemoglobin A1C 9% (75 mmol/mol) or less, and insulin pump treatment for at least 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a closed-loop device or sensor-augmented pump (open loop) therapy. Randomisation was by a permuted block randomisation scheme, using an interactive web-based response system, and was stratified on centre (block size 6). The assessed closed-loop device, the Diabeloop for Kids DBL4K hybrid closed-loop system, is an automated blood glucose regulation system composed of a handset, insulin pump, and continuous glucose monitor. The open-loop system is defined as a sensor-augmented pump therapy composed of the usual insulin pump used by the patient and a continuous glucose monitor. A 72-h in-patient period was followed by a 6-week home phase. After a 1-week washout period, the participants crossed over to the other device. The primary outcome, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, was the mean proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemia (3·9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL]) during the hospital phase, with a non-inferiority margin of -2·5% (absolute value). Safety was assessed in the intention-to-treat population on a per-protocol basis. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03671915. FINDINGS: Between May 6 and Dec 23, 2019, we included 21 participants (closed loop then open loop, n=10; open loop then closed loop, n=11). The proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemia was significantly lower with the closed-loop system than the open-loop system in both groups (2·04% [95% CI 0·44 to 3·64] vs 7·06% [5·46 to 8·66]; non-inferiority one-sided p<0·0001). No severe ketoacidosis, nor severe hyoglycaemic events or fatal adverse events occurred. All 25 adverse events (18 with the closed-loop system, seven with the open-loop system) were related to the treatment. INTERPRETATION: The closed-loop Diabeloop system decreased hypoglycaemic episodes and provided good metabolic control in prepubescent children with type 1 diabetes, under real-life conditions. This finding supports the safe use of closed-loop technology in this paediatric population. FUNDING: Diabeloop. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Factors Associated With Insulin Pump Discontinuation in Adults With Diabetes: A Time-to-Invent Analysis and Prediction Model.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin pump discontinuation has mostly been studied in children and adolescents living with diabetes. We aimed to assess the rate of insulin pump continuation in a population of adult patients with diabetes, at 18 months after initiation; determine the factors associated with pump discontinuation; and develop a simple prediction model. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included all adult patients with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes who started insulin pump treatment between January 2015 and June 2018. The exclusion criteria were pregnancy, short-term pregnancy plans, and insulin pump discontinuation within the previous 6 months. The probability of insulin pump continuation after 18 months was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with insulin pump discontinuation were studied using a Cox regression model, and an exponential model was built for prediction purposes. RESULTS: The study included 315 patients. The mean age was 41 years, the mean duration of diabetes was 16 years, 50% were men, 74% had type 1 diabetes, and the mean hemoglobin A1c level was 9.1% (76 mmol/mol). After 18 months, the rate of insulin pump continuation was 0.80 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.76-0.85). By multivariate analysis, the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia in the previous year was associated with insulin pump discontinuation (hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.30-4.51), while other factors did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Insulin pump discontinuation occurred in 20% of patients at 18 months after initiation and was mainly associated with a recent history of severe hypoglycemia. The type of diabetes and glycemic control at baseline were not associated with treatment discontinuation.

Short course corticosteroid treatment and closed-loop insulin delivery system: The experience of the DBLG1 pre-launch.

No abstract (brief report).

COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in young people with type 1 diabetes: Positive results of an unprecedented challenge for patients through telemedicine and change in use of continuous glucose monitoring.

There has been little data published related to glucose control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during lockdown, but rarely focusing on telemedicine's role. During this unpreceded period, glucose control and self-monitoring improved in our young patients, with better results associated with telemedicine.

No more hypoglycaemia on days with physical activity and unrestricted diet when using a closed-loop system for 12 weeks: A post hoc secondary analysis of the multicentre, randomized controlled Diabeloop WP7 trial.

A post hoc analysis of the Diabeloop WP7 multicentre, randomized controlled trial was performed to investigate the efficacy of the Diabeloop Generation-1 (DBLG1) closed-loop system in controlling the hypoglycaemia induced by physical activity (PA) in real-life conditions. Glycaemic outcomes were compared between days with and without PA in 56 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using DBLG1 for 12 weeks. After the patient announces a PA, DBLG1 reduces insulin delivery and, if necessary, calculates the amount of preventive carbohydrates (CHO). Daily time spent in the interstitial glucose range less than 70 mg/dL was not significantly different between days with and without PA (2.0% ± 1.5% vs. 2.2% ± 1.1%), regardless of the intensity or duration of the PA. Preventive CHO intake recommended by the system was significantly higher in days with PA (41.1 ± 35.5 vs. 21.8 ± 28.5 g/day; P < .0001), and insulin delivery was significantly lower (31.5 ± 10.5 vs. 34.0 ± 10.5 U/day; P < .0001). The time spent in hyperglycaemia and the glycaemic variation coefficient increased significantly on days with PA. In real-life conditions, the use of DBLG1 avoids PA-induced hypoglycaemia. Insulin adjustments and preventive CHO recommendation may explain this therapeutic benefit.

Diabeloop DBLG1 Closed-Loop System Enables Patients With Type 1 Diabetes to Significantly Improve Their Glycemic Control in Real-Life Situations Without Serious Adverse Events: 6-Month Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze safety and efficacy of the Diabeloop Generation 1 (DBLG1) hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system in patients with type 1 diabetes in real-world conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After a 1-week run-in period with their usual pump, 25 patients were provided the commercial DBLG1 system. The results are presented on time in range (TIR) and HbA1c over 6 months. RESULTS: The mean (SD; range) age of patients was 43 (13.8; 25-72) years. At baseline, the mean HbA1c and TIR 70-180 mg/dL were, respectively, 7.9% (0.93; 5.6-8.5%) [63 mmol/mol (10; 38-69 mmol/mol)] and 53% (16.4; 21-85%). One patient stopped using the system after 2 months. At 6 months, the mean HbA1c decreased to 7.1% [54 mmol/mol] (P < 0.001) and TIR 70-180 mg/dL increased to 69.7% (P < 0.0001). TIR <70 mg/dL decreased from 2.4 to 1.3% (P = 0.03), and TIR <54 mg/dL decreased from 0.32 to 0.24% (P = 0.42). No serious adverse event was reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the DBLG1 system to significantly improve glycemic control in real-world conditions, without serious adverse events, was confirmed in this follow-up study.

Patients with highly unstable type 1 diabetes eligible for islet transplantation can be managed with a closed-loop insulin delivery system: A series of N-of-1 randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To compare the efficacy of the closed-loop Diabeloop for highly unstable diabetes (DBLHU) system with the open-loop predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) system in patients with highly unstable type 1 diabetes (T1D) who experience acute metabolic events. METHODS: DBLHU-WP10 was an interventional, controlled, randomized, open-label study that comprised two cycles of N-of-1 trials (2-of-1 trials). Each trial consisted of two crossover 4-week periods of treatment with either DBLHU or PLGS in randomized order. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the 70-180 mg/dL glucose range (time in range [TIR]). RESULTS: Five out of seven randomized patients completed the aggregated 2-of-1 trials. TIR was significantly higher with DBLHU (73.3% ± 1.7%) compared with PLGS (43.5% ± 1.7%; P < .0001). The percentage of time below 70 mg/dL was significantly lower with DBLHU (0.9% ± 0.4%) versus PLGS (3.7% ± 0.4%; P < .0001). DBLHU was also significantly superior to PLGS in reducing hyperglycaemic excursions and improving almost all other secondary outcomes, including glucose variability and satisfaction score. No adverse event could be related to the experimental treatment. CONCLUSIONS: DBLHU was superior to PLGS in improving the metabolic control of patients with highly unstable T1D who require an islet or pancreas transplant but who either have a contraindication or refuse to consent.